title
Products            Buy            Support Forum            Professional            About            Codec Central
 

Mp3 Patent Problems

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • neilthecellist
    dBpoweramp Guru

    • Dec 2004
    • 1288

    #61
    Re: Mp3 Patent Problems

    Right....so, should I just stick to FhG? or Blade? I find that with classical music, it sounds ultra-high in treble when it comes to classical music

    Comment

    • Larry!

      • May 2002
      • 46

      #62
      Re: Mp3 Patent Problems

      Again...It depends...
      On your purpose =)
      New lame (3.96, 3.97alpha) great for making extremely-low -16-64kbps
      bitrate files(ebooks for instance), while FhG acts way better imo
      on higher bitrates - 192kbps and so on...
      Imho, when possible, it's better to use some newer and
      more advanced solutions, like aac.

      PS.: Main rule in coding audio - is to stay as close
      as possible to the original sound.
      Last edited by Larry!; April 14, 2005, 05:43 PM.

      Comment

      • Link500X

        • Apr 2005
        • 26

        #63
        Re: Mp3 Patent Problems

        All mp3 codecs put artifacts in songs.
        Lame seems to put static in. This is especially noticable at silent parts of a track. At lower bitrates this is expected with all codecs, but it should not happen at high bitrates. Lame is best at low-mid bitrates.
        Blade's artifact is a reverb-like effect at low-mid bitrates. The effect disappears at high bitrates. You should not use Blade at bitrates lower than 192kbps.
        I don't know enough about Fhg to make any comparisons to blade and lame.

        Comment

        • neilthecellist
          dBpoweramp Guru

          • Dec 2004
          • 1288

          #64
          Re: Mp3 Patent Problems

          You know what? Based on your descriptions, Link500X, mp3 encoders just suck in general. I'm not trying to offend what you said or anything, but I'm beginning to think about abandoning mp3 and moving on to ogg vorbis and aac.....

          Comment

          • Link500X

            • Apr 2005
            • 26

            #65
            Re: Mp3 Patent Problems

            Yes, MP3 does pretty much suck. OGG is much better, but the best lossy codec is MPC. Many people just use MP3 because alot of hardware(cd players, mp3 players, etc.) supports it. There are a few cd players that support OGG, but I don't know of any that support MPC.

            Comment

            • Larry!

              • May 2002
              • 46

              #66
              Re: Mp3 Patent Problems

              Ok, i have to say sum to keep this offtopic on XD
              that properly encoded mp3 at reasonable bitrate(192 and up)
              even with lame enc sounds good enough for me...
              I'm not an audioexpert though.

              Comment

              • neilthecellist
                dBpoweramp Guru

                • Dec 2004
                • 1288

                #67
                Re: Mp3 Patent Problems

                Have you done ABX testing, Larry! ?

                Comment

                • Larry!

                  • May 2002
                  • 46

                  #68
                  Re: Mp3 Patent Problems

                  Nah... Just the oldfashioned sound-to-ear testing, kid.

                  Comment

                  • neilthecellist
                    dBpoweramp Guru

                    • Dec 2004
                    • 1288

                    #69
                    Re: Mp3 Patent Problems

                    Originally posted by Larry!
                    Nah... Just the oldfashioned sound-to-ear testing, kid.
                    lol. cool.

                    Comment

                    Working...

                    ]]>