I recently bought DBPoweramp and am pleased with it so far. I ripped several CD's and then wanted to do some classical CD's. With classical it is fairly common to want to combine multiple tracks to get all the movements. For instance the first 3 tracks of Vivaldi's Four Seasons:
1. Spring - 1. Allegro
2. Spring - 2. Largo
3. Spring - 3. Allegro
You would want to combine these 3 in to Spring.
Searching the forum this seems to be a common wish and there are 2 methods that work, but are not as nice as what folks seem to ask for. You can run Rip as One which requires you running the Rip multiple times. For the Four seasons this would be 4 separate rips. ALso you can use the DSP Insert Audio. The instructions for this are not really clear. I selected Track 1 and then did 2 Insert Audio's pointing to the CD itself for track 2 and track 3. This seems to work but the results are radically different. Using Rip as one I get a 65 MB file showing 62% Compressed (level 5 FLAC selected). Using the DSP I get a 40MB file also showing 62% Compressed. Individually the 3 files would match about what the DSP method gives. So Rip as One seems to create a much larger file. Is there any recommendation as to what is the best method? Any thoughts on why Rip as One creates a larger file?
Is there any chance that there will ever be a more user friendly way of combining tracks such as provided by Audiograbber?? Both the original Xing Audio Catalyst and Audiograbber let you select Track properties with a Right click of the track and then you can modify the start and end sector. This is very useful for combining tracks or getting rid of unwanted audio such as talking in a live CD or talking at the beginning of a song for a Musical such as Phantom where you set the start sector to skip to the actual music. You can do this for all tracks and then finally do the rip. Just download the free Audiograbber to see how Jackie did it. Rip as One is close to this but requires running multiple times. I assume that Verification wold be bypassed when doing this, but thats to be expected since you modify the start and end sector.
Maybe you could provide a List of known wishes or requirements so as to avoid us asking multiple times.
Once again I am happy overall with the product. These are just comments on what would make it even better for me.
1. Spring - 1. Allegro
2. Spring - 2. Largo
3. Spring - 3. Allegro
You would want to combine these 3 in to Spring.
Searching the forum this seems to be a common wish and there are 2 methods that work, but are not as nice as what folks seem to ask for. You can run Rip as One which requires you running the Rip multiple times. For the Four seasons this would be 4 separate rips. ALso you can use the DSP Insert Audio. The instructions for this are not really clear. I selected Track 1 and then did 2 Insert Audio's pointing to the CD itself for track 2 and track 3. This seems to work but the results are radically different. Using Rip as one I get a 65 MB file showing 62% Compressed (level 5 FLAC selected). Using the DSP I get a 40MB file also showing 62% Compressed. Individually the 3 files would match about what the DSP method gives. So Rip as One seems to create a much larger file. Is there any recommendation as to what is the best method? Any thoughts on why Rip as One creates a larger file?
Is there any chance that there will ever be a more user friendly way of combining tracks such as provided by Audiograbber?? Both the original Xing Audio Catalyst and Audiograbber let you select Track properties with a Right click of the track and then you can modify the start and end sector. This is very useful for combining tracks or getting rid of unwanted audio such as talking in a live CD or talking at the beginning of a song for a Musical such as Phantom where you set the start sector to skip to the actual music. You can do this for all tracks and then finally do the rip. Just download the free Audiograbber to see how Jackie did it. Rip as One is close to this but requires running multiple times. I assume that Verification wold be bypassed when doing this, but thats to be expected since you modify the start and end sector.
Maybe you could provide a List of known wishes or requirements so as to avoid us asking multiple times.
Once again I am happy overall with the product. These are just comments on what would make it even better for me.
Comment