Sometimes, the metadata in multiple databases is totally messed up on some of the more esoteric cds. I'm beginning to think that cognitive impairment is a requirement for submitting data to them. When the problem is simple, such as all the titles being in the artist column and vice versa, isn't there some way to transpose the data all at once instead of having to do it manually track by track?
I am also wondering why, after removing the cd, you can no longer submit changes to freedb or AMG. Even if you put the cd back in, the option to submit changes is greyed out at that point. After laboriously correcting all the wrong info, if I forget to submit the info, then I'll have to do it all over again if I have to re-rip the cd for some reason in the future, not that that submitting the corrections seems to do much good. Even when the original metadata in their database seem to have been submitted by someone with no blood in their alcohol system, freedb regularly rejects the corrections. I've read their FAQs, but I fail to understand how some of the most glaring errors can remain uncorrectable due to whatever freedb uses to decide if the submission is authentic. My collection was not obtained from the black market. [By "errors," I'm not referring to the different ways we all have of formatting things, like whether or not to include the "the" in a group's name (I prefer omitting the "the" to having to put up with ludicrous formatting I sometimes see like "Beatles, The," which angers me to no end.)]
I am also wondering why, after removing the cd, you can no longer submit changes to freedb or AMG. Even if you put the cd back in, the option to submit changes is greyed out at that point. After laboriously correcting all the wrong info, if I forget to submit the info, then I'll have to do it all over again if I have to re-rip the cd for some reason in the future, not that that submitting the corrections seems to do much good. Even when the original metadata in their database seem to have been submitted by someone with no blood in their alcohol system, freedb regularly rejects the corrections. I've read their FAQs, but I fail to understand how some of the most glaring errors can remain uncorrectable due to whatever freedb uses to decide if the submission is authentic. My collection was not obtained from the black market. [By "errors," I'm not referring to the different ways we all have of formatting things, like whether or not to include the "the" in a group's name (I prefer omitting the "the" to having to put up with ludicrous formatting I sometimes see like "Beatles, The," which angers me to no end.)]
Comment