illustrate
Products            Buy            Support Forum            Registrations            About           
 

dBpoweramp R17 [Windows] Discussion

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dingfod
    replied
    Re: dBpoweramp R17 [Windows] Discussion

    Crap. OK, is there any workaround to newly-submitted DiscID's not being properly queried by batchripper after a week? Could I delete some local cache or wait longer? I can snap an image of my XP system and upgrade to Vista, but that'll be more complicated.

    Leave a comment:


  • Spoon-
    replied
    Re: dBpoweramp R17 [Windows] Discussion

    It will not work from a compiler point of view, we use Microsoft Visual Studio 2017 now, it uses API calls only present in Visa or newer. The program will not run on XP.

    Leave a comment:


  • dingfod
    replied
    Re: dBpoweramp R17 [Windows] Discussion

    Hey, Spoon, I found this thread (https://forum.dbpoweramp.com/showthread.php?44334) where a MusicBrainz metadata issue is fixed in R17, but I saw in the changelog that XP is no longer supported. My Elite Micro changer setup is XP and I'm loathe to change it because it just works. Totally understand dropping support for XP. Just wondering: Will it install on XP, but not supported if I have issues OR is install blocked if installer detects XP?

    Leave a comment:


  • thexfile
    replied
    Re: dBpoweramp R17 [Windows] Discussion

    Minus freedb, all of them.

    Free image hosting and sharing service, upload pictures, photo host. Offers integration solutions for uploading images to forums.


    This only happens on new rips.
    Last edited by thexfile; February 02, 2020, 05:46 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Spoon-
    replied
    Re: dBpoweramp R17 [Windows] Discussion

    Which providers are checked under the menu drop down? is perfectmeta enabled?

    Leave a comment:


  • thexfile
    replied
    Re: dBpoweramp R17 [Windows] Discussion

    I'm getting blanks in the song title.




    Beta 6
    Last edited by thexfile; February 02, 2020, 02:16 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • RLANE
    replied
    Re: dBpoweramp R17 [Windows] Discussion

    Originally posted by RLANE
    I have attached two files.

    The text file has the rule script

    The JPG shows the Tags successfully create after ripping and encoding complete.
    I figured how to do this programmatically.
    I did not own Reference when I started using dbpoweramp, but hav it now and noticed you can do this if you own reference.


    [composer]\[genre]\[tag]SubGenre[]\[tag]Composition[]\[artist] - [year][IFVALUE]ReleaseNote,[tag]ReleaseNote[],[][IFVALUE]SPARS, ([tag]SPARS[],[][IFVALUE]MasterYear, - [tag]MasterYear[],[][IFVALUE]MasterNote, [tag]MasterNote[],[][IFVALUE]SPARS,)[][IFVALUE]ReleaseYear, &*8471;[tag]ReleaseYear[],[]\[tag]CompositionPart[]\FLAC\[IFVALUE][tag]CompositionSeq[],[tag]CompositionSeq[],[][IFVALUE][tag]CompositionTrack[],[tag]CompositionTrack[],[track][] - [title]

    Leave a comment:


  • Spoon-
    replied
    Re: dBpoweramp R17 [Windows] Discussion

    Ok noted, looks like some kind of bug.

    Leave a comment:


  • pete_l
    replied
    Re: dBpoweramp R17 [Windows] Discussion

    Originally posted by Spoon
    It is not a google type search where you enter part information, you need to enter the full album name, so:

    blinky
    Heart Full Of Soul: The Motown Anthology
    When I search with the full title, the problem persists - Screenshot attached.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Metadata.png
Views:	1
Size:	21.4 KB
ID:	294210

    The CD is found (like before), but every track title is listed as:
    "Hidden First Track ..."

    Leave a comment:


  • Spoon-
    replied
    Re: dBpoweramp R17 [Windows] Discussion

    It is not a google type search where you enter part information, you need to enter the full album name, so:

    blinky
    Heart Full Of Soul: The Motown Anthology

    However there does seem an issue (the 2 discs are joined as one big one... so will look at that).

    Leave a comment:


  • pete_l
    replied
    Re: dBpoweramp R17 [Windows] Discussion

    Hello,

    when using manual metadata lookup, the information is not retrieved correctly from discogs, like displayed in the attached screenshot:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	ManualMetadataSearch.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	71.4 KB
ID:	294209

    This seems to happen with every CD I tried. (I am using dbpoweramp via WINE on ubuntu.)

    The information is correctly displayed on the discogs website, though:
    https://www.discogs.com/Blinky-Heart...lease/14495558

    Very best wishes
    Pete

    Leave a comment:


  • pete_l
    replied
    Re: dBpoweramp R17 [Windows] Discussion

    Hi,

    when manually looking up metadata (via discogs), I always retrieve incorrect metadata like displayed in the attached screenshot:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	ManualMetadataSearch.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	71.4 KB
ID:	294208

    The discogs website lists the metadata correctly, though:

    https://www.discogs.com/Blinky-Heart...lease/14495558

    Very best wishes
    Pete

    Leave a comment:


  • RLANE
    replied
    Re: dBpoweramp R17 [Windows] Discussion

    I have attached two files.

    The text file has the rule script

    The JPG shows the Tags successfully create after ripping and encoding complete.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Spoon-
    replied
    Re: dBpoweramp R17 [Windows] Discussion

    Please share the lines where AlbumFolderName and TrackFilename are created.

    Leave a comment:


  • RLANE
    replied
    Re: dBpoweramp R17 [Windows] Discussion

    Installed Beta 5 today.

    Had to recreate DSP effects for each encoder (FLAC and MP3).

    I use several custom tags in the Dynamic Naming formula.

    The naming no longer functions correctly though.

    Two of the custom tags are created with Rule Based Manipulations in the ID Tag Processing DSP.

    It looks like the Rule Based Manipulations in the ID Tag Processing DSP are no longer being resolved before each track is ripped.

    I can look at the created files, and those tags do get created correctly. So I assume it is a timing issue as stated above.

    The two dynamic tags AlbumbFolderName and TrackFileName.

    [composer]\[genre]\[tag]SubGenre[]\[tag]Composition[]\[tag]AlbumFolderName[]\FLAC\[track] - [tag]TrackFilename[]

    The files are being created with this structure:

    [composer]\[genre]\[tag]SubGenre[]\[tag]Composition[]\\FLAC\[track] -
    Last edited by RLANE; January 19, 2020, 12:02 AM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...