illustrate
Products            Buy            Support Forum            Registrations            About           
 

dBpoweramp Batch Ripper: Discussions

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • CiXel
    replied
    Re: dBpoweramp Batch Ripper: Discussions

    Originally posted by Spoon
    Cixel: What naming string are you using? (click 'edit' next to profile) and copy the naming string (click set next to naming).
    Here is my naming string. Sorry for the delay.

    [IFCOMP][IFVALUE]album artist,[album artist],Various Artists[]\[album][IFMULTI] (disc [disc])[]\[track]-[title]([artist] - [album][IFMULTI] (disc [disc])[])[][IF!COMP][IFVALUE]album artist,[album artist],[artist][]\[album] [IFMULTI](disc [disc])[]\[track]-[title]([artist] - [album][IFMULTI] (disc [disc])[])[]

    Leave a comment:


  • Spoon
    replied
    Re: dBpoweramp Batch Ripper: Discussions

    Just delete cdgrab.exe, it will not rip then.

    Leave a comment:


  • bhoar
    replied
    Re: dBpoweramp Batch Ripper: Discussions

    Another request:

    The batch ripper drive configuration screen has sections for each of five external requests: pre-batch, load, unload, reject and post-batch.

    My suggestion:

    Allow for two additional user configurable calls. By making them configurable, you keep the GUI generic and the relationship with automation hardware abstracted.

    - In keeping with the naming scheme, the subdirectory names would be User1 and User2
    - The executables called would be User1.exe and User2.exe.
    - The batch ripper, when idle, would allow you to right click on a drive line and activate either User1 or User2 (note: ugly menu items addressed by next bullet point). I repeat - these should be greyed out unless the batch ripper is idle.
    - The DefaultCmdLine.txt syntax would be extended to support a fourth line of text. That line, if set, would replace the text shown in the line above the edit field ("User1" and "User2" in this case) in the batch ripper drive configuration scheme as well as in the batch ripper right click menu.
    - If I'm not already too far out on a limb, a fifth line could be added to DefaultCmdLine.txt which could be used to store a substitution for the "Are you sure?" text question when called via right-click menu.

    Example #1:

    For the Sonly XL1B/XL1B2/XL1B3 units, you could use this functionality to add "Perform Disc Inventory" and "Perform Mass Eject" commands, rather than having to rely on external tools (or front panel buttons).

    Example #2:

    For some of the robots, I could add commands such as "Toggle Robotic Shake mode" or "Perform Full Robotic Reset".

    In addition, it is probably a good idea to add a "Are you sure you want to xxx?" dialog box for right click options such as this, of course.

    -brendan

    PS - if two is good, hey, why not three? Yes, I know, it makes the GUI busy...I know, I know.
    Last edited by bhoar; April 03, 2008, 01:48 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • bhoar
    replied
    Re: dBpoweramp Batch Ripper: Discussions

    Spoon - a request for the batch ripper.

    Would it be possible to have a setting in the batch ripper that not only skips the encoding step (I can already do that by choosing the Test Conversion codec) but actually skips the entire ripping process as well, just loading and unloading?

    I know that sounds really silly, but it would be useful for hardware testing purposes now and in the future.

    Why? Over the next few weeks, I am going to be performing reliability testing of the ULCLI with several robots - the ability to skip the rip step would save wear and tear on the drives and will also reduce the test time.

    -brendan

    PS - If not, hmm...what I'll probably do as a workaround is either load stacks of blanks/cdroms (or load stacks of audio CDs upside down), putting only a few good audio cds into the mix...and then reverse the ULCLI configurations for reject and unload. That should simulate things pretty close to correctly from the robot point of view, esp. since the ULCLI handles all the reject counting anyway.

    Leave a comment:


  • Spoon
    replied
    Re: dBpoweramp Batch Ripper: Discussions

    Cixel: What naming string are you using? (click 'edit' next to profile) and copy the naming string (click set next to naming).

    Leave a comment:


  • CiXel
    replied
    Re: dBpoweramp Batch Ripper: Discussions

    One thing that is still killing me in RC2 is that Long meta data is truncated and parsed incorrectly.

    Ie. Free DB Disc-ID: rock / 9b0aac0c

    Paul Simon / Still Crazy After All These Years (Expanded + Remastered)

    Shows up as
    stered) - stered)
    in batch ripper. Even the artist is superseded.

    Therefore I get:
    Ripped 'Track 1' to 'E:\Mpeg\New\TAG\FLAC\stered)\stered)\01-Still Crazy After All These Years(stered) - stered)).flac'
    Which makes it difficult to figure out what the album actually is after the fact.

    I have many examples of this.
    FreeDb Disc-ID: rock / 9708330d
    Bee Gees / Bee Gees - Studio Albums 67-68 (Disc 4: Horizontal Unissued)
    Shows up as:
    Artist: nissued)
    Album: nissued)

    Might be worth looking into before it is actually unleashed.

    Leave a comment:


  • EliC
    replied
    Re: dBpoweramp Batch Ripper: Discussions

    This discussion really should be in R13 or wishlist.

    Leave a comment:


  • Teknojnky
    replied
    Re: dBpoweramp Batch Ripper: Discussions

    yea drive tabs would be great, or even simply being able to change the drive drop down while ripping to be able to view/rip from multiple drives simultaniously.

    so in essence, the UI would be one thread, while each drive and it's rip/encode threads would all be separate and you could easily/quickly change which drive your viewing without affecting any other drive/process.

    You can already eject after rip from the options, but you can't change the option while ripping (since the option button is disabled during rips).
    Options > cd rom > checkbox eject after rip

    see post here regarding improving eject after rip.

    I second the auto-rip on insert request.

    Leave a comment:


  • onthejazz
    replied
    Re: dBpoweramp Batch Ripper: Discussions

    DRIVE TABS would be brilliant!

    Leave a comment:


  • EliC
    replied
    Re: dBpoweramp Batch Ripper: Discussions

    Originally posted by Teknojnky

    Or, more simply, I would like to be able to rip multiple discs straight from a single CDGrab without resorting to batch ripper.

    Manually running multiple instances of cdgrab (without using batch ripper) is just an inelegant solution, IMO.
    I agree, and do not think this would take away from the commercial use of the batch ripper. Commercial users will use the batch ripper and robots.

    I have requested DRIVE TABS, so that each drive could have a separate tab in the ripper, so that you don't need to open the program multiple times. I would also like to see the return of Rip on Insert and Eject after rip options.

    Leave a comment:


  • bhoar
    replied
    Re: dBpoweramp Batch Ripper: Discussions

    My earlier suggestion of drive profiles (that is "profiles" of rip-related settings per drive) might address part of the issue, should spoon consider it.

    -brendan

    Leave a comment:


  • Teknojnky
    replied
    Re: dBpoweramp Batch Ripper: Discussions

    I can understand my usage case may not be the same as profesional rippers (simply 2-3 drives via ata & external usb), but I would like to see being able to easily configure/change settings of the individual drives and other settings of the main ripper, via the batch ripper.

    In other words, I would like an 'options' button/menu just like cdgrab has in case I want/need to change modes or settings for a particular cd.

    Or, more simply, I would like to be able to rip multiple discs straight from a single CDGrab without resorting to batch ripper.

    Manually running multiple instances of cdgrab (without using batch ripper) is just an inelegant solution, IMO.

    Leave a comment:


  • bhoar
    replied
    Re: dBpoweramp Batch Ripper: Discussions

    Originally posted by Spoon
    Tracktype does not make sense in batch ripper (it is likely the data is from freedb so cannot be used for intelligent lookup).
    Ok, perhaps my argument wasn't clear.

    a) batch ripper has settings for freedb, so i take it that freedb usable in some capacity in the batch ripper.
    b) tracktype works like freedb.
    c) tracktype includes freedb data (a superset or a fork?0.
    d) tracktype might be up and running when the freedb infrastructure is unavailable.

    what am i missing?

    And even if there's a reason the above argument doesn't apply to the batch ripper, surely it applies to the cd ripper...

    -brendan

    Leave a comment:


  • EliC
    replied
    Re: dBpoweramp Batch Ripper: Discussions

    I don't know what algorithm you are using for matching results with intelligent look up, but a rule that if the tracktype data matches freedb, then it does NOT increase the confidence that the data is correct...

    Leave a comment:


  • Spoon
    replied
    Re: dBpoweramp Batch Ripper: Discussions

    Tracktype does not make sense in batch ripper (it is likely the data is from freedb so cannot be used for intelligent lookup).

    Leave a comment:

Working...