How To Embed Album Art In Ripped WAV Files?

[Wickedfox]

In dbpoweramp control center I have tagging set to ID3, yet when I rip a album and play it through windows media player, the album art doesn't come up. Does WMP not read those tags or am I missing something? I also have the tag album art selected in the CDGrab tagging settings. Im gonna put the files on a DAP / Mp3 player (Hiby R4) and I want to know if it'll show up or not before going through and ripping everything and transferring everything over

[Wickedfox]

Im on Windows 11 by the way

[Spoon]

Only a few programs will read ID3v2 tags from wave files, WMP is not one of them, so in short WMP cannot read album art from any wave file.

[Wickedfox]

Only a few programs will read ID3v2 tags from wave files, WMP is not one of them, so in short WMP cannot read album art from any wave file.

Your right. VLC media player can read it though. Having ID3 album art enabled won't effect sound quality right?

[Spoon]

No

[Dat Ei]

Is there a special reason why you use WAV files and not flac files? Flac files have the same audio quality (lossless) as WAV files, but have advantages concerning metadata or integrity check.


Dat Ei

[Wickedfox]

Is there a special reason why you use WAV files and not flac files? Flac files have the same audio quality (lossless) as WAV files, but have advantages concerning metadata or integrity check.


Dat Ei

Call me crazy, but I think wav files sound better. Plus the KBPS on wav is higher than flac. Wav is also the industry standard so I just go with it. I have a 2tb micro sd card for my player with over 2,000 wav files and it's not even near filled up. Everyone has their preference and mine is wav.

[GBrown]

Call me crazy, but I think wav files sound better. Plus the KBPS on wav is higher than flac. Wav is also the industry standard so I just go with it. I have a 2tb micro sd card for my player with over 2,000 wav files and it's not even near filled up. Everyone has their preference and mine is wav.

OK stick with wav. But it is much more limited with the metadata and album art compatibility, and many players do not support this. But for the record, any lossless format like FLAC or ALAC is bit-for-bit identical to wav when they are decoded, hence the term lossless. Any difference you perceive is likely just that.

[Dat Ei]

Hey WickedFox,

Call me crazy, but I think wav files sound better. Plus the KBPS on wav is higher than flac.

ok, it's not my business to convince you. WAV and flac are both lossless codecs. You can convert WAV to FLAC and vice versa as often as you like and get the same result bit for bit every time. While flac is able to use a lossless compression (like zip) to gain smaller file sizes, both codecs have the same information, audio data, sample rate and bit depth within.

Wav is also the industry standard so I just go with it.

WAV is an very old standard from the beginning of the 1990s. FLAC is from the early 2000s and has several advantages in comparison to WAV, like the lossless compression, the metadata handling or the audio data checksums within the files to check the integrity of files. As said before the correct playback of WAV files with metadata within depends on the player software itself. Some player reproduce clicking sounds, cause they can't handle metadata within WAV files, some can show the album art some can not, some can show the correct metadata and some can not...

But you do you... Good luck!


Dat Ei