Hi All,
I am looking to confirm or correct my understanding of sample offsets and lead-in / lead-out with regards to ripping with dBpoweramp.
From what I have researched, a drive with a +6 read offset would be able to read all audio samples from the first track of an album, but be unable to read the final 6 samples from the last track. A drive with a -667 offset would be able to read every sample from the final track, but the first 667 samples of the first track will be missing. This is for drives that do not support overread into the lead-in or lead-out of a disc.
If this is correct, then theoretically with two drives, one with a “+” offset and one with a “-“ offset, could this be used to get every audio sample from the first and last tracks of any album?
Another question, for a final track ripped with a +6 offset, does dBpoweramp pad those samples with null “0” samples, or is the track just missing 6 samples at the end? I understand that a 6 sample loss is only 0.000136 seconds, but I’m curious from a preservation and generational loss perspective. If not, is there a way to implement padding those missing samples with null samples?
Thanks.
Z-Lemur
I am looking to confirm or correct my understanding of sample offsets and lead-in / lead-out with regards to ripping with dBpoweramp.
From what I have researched, a drive with a +6 read offset would be able to read all audio samples from the first track of an album, but be unable to read the final 6 samples from the last track. A drive with a -667 offset would be able to read every sample from the final track, but the first 667 samples of the first track will be missing. This is for drives that do not support overread into the lead-in or lead-out of a disc.
If this is correct, then theoretically with two drives, one with a “+” offset and one with a “-“ offset, could this be used to get every audio sample from the first and last tracks of any album?
Another question, for a final track ripped with a +6 offset, does dBpoweramp pad those samples with null “0” samples, or is the track just missing 6 samples at the end? I understand that a 6 sample loss is only 0.000136 seconds, but I’m curious from a preservation and generational loss perspective. If not, is there a way to implement padding those missing samples with null samples?
Thanks.
Z-Lemur

Comment