Tweet
Hi Spoon,
just started to work with BatchRipper and a MiniCubis. Saves me a lot of time, excellent software!
May I make a suggestion?
Of course, an automated lookup can never 100% cover all versions of discs, that are out there (though I am really amazed, how great things match!!), especially, when there are faulty entries in the databases (discovered already a few in AMG, when ripping classical CDs - from the 60 CDs ripped, 6 entries had wrong artists; when reripping them manually, I could correct the entries by a manual combination of perfect-meta-entries).
Would it be possible to store the provided Meta-lookup of all databases/sources for each CD of the batch as well? The idea is:when right-clicking on the finished rip in the lower window, there is an option, that brings up the perfect-meta-window, we can use when manually ripping, and we can change tags and apply them? That would help correcting faulty entries or combine entries from different databases in problematic cases (f.e.: titles are better in one database, track artist entries are better in the other one).
Thanks!
just started to work with BatchRipper and a MiniCubis. Saves me a lot of time, excellent software!
May I make a suggestion?
Of course, an automated lookup can never 100% cover all versions of discs, that are out there (though I am really amazed, how great things match!!), especially, when there are faulty entries in the databases (discovered already a few in AMG, when ripping classical CDs - from the 60 CDs ripped, 6 entries had wrong artists; when reripping them manually, I could correct the entries by a manual combination of perfect-meta-entries).
Would it be possible to store the provided Meta-lookup of all databases/sources for each CD of the batch as well? The idea is:when right-clicking on the finished rip in the lower window, there is an option, that brings up the perfect-meta-window, we can use when manually ripping, and we can change tags and apply them? That would help correcting faulty entries or combine entries from different databases in problematic cases (f.e.: titles are better in one database, track artist entries are better in the other one).
Thanks!
Comment