Tweet
I am using the following as my naming convention:
[artist]\[album]\[track] - [title]
I modified this to support multiple discs as follows:
[artist]\[album]\[IFMULTI]Disc [disc]\[][track] - [title]
This works fine but I do have a couple questions.
1) Is there any way to get all tracks into a single folder for multiple discs that will not adversely affect playback performance, i.e. a player could treat it as one disc and play through all tracks across discs in the correct order?
2) In the above scenario I use, I believe multiple folders are treated as multiple albums by most if not all players. In that case, do I need to have the album art stored in each (Disc 1, Disc 2, etc.) folder, or can it be in the main [album] folder?
I'm trying to understand the best approach for treating multiple disc releases as a single album. I'm not sure this is really possible without manually retagging all the track numbers beyond the first disc, i.e. disc 1 is tracks 1-10, disc 2 gets retagged from 11 - x and so on, which I don't want to do.
[artist]\[album]\[track] - [title]
I modified this to support multiple discs as follows:
[artist]\[album]\[IFMULTI]Disc [disc]\[][track] - [title]
This works fine but I do have a couple questions.
1) Is there any way to get all tracks into a single folder for multiple discs that will not adversely affect playback performance, i.e. a player could treat it as one disc and play through all tracks across discs in the correct order?
2) In the above scenario I use, I believe multiple folders are treated as multiple albums by most if not all players. In that case, do I need to have the album art stored in each (Disc 1, Disc 2, etc.) folder, or can it be in the main [album] folder?
I'm trying to understand the best approach for treating multiple disc releases as a single album. I'm not sure this is really possible without manually retagging all the track numbers beyond the first disc, i.e. disc 1 is tracks 1-10, disc 2 gets retagged from 11 - x and so on, which I don't want to do.
Comment