title
Products            Buy            Support Forum            Professional            About            Codec Central
 

LAME -V0 --vbr-new equivilant setting

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Spoon
    Administrator
    • Apr 2002
    • 44575

    #16
    Re: LAME -V0 --vbr-new equivilant setting

    We use our own compile of Lame, different compilers give very slight differences to lame (use Microsoft and Intel and GCC and all will not produce identical files, it is how floating point in lame works). This also accounts for speed differences.

    If you want to use the lame.exe then use the cli, we have our own compile because we can put floating point data straight into lame, the lame.exe cannot.
    Spoon
    www.dbpoweramp.com

    Comment

    • cubiq

      • Jan 2007
      • 6

      #17
      Re: LAME -V0 --vbr-new equivilant setting

      I understand what you are saying here but could you go into a bit more detail as to how the internal lame encoding works when ripping directly a whole CD. I say ripping directly because when doing this and inspecting the lame tags with LameTagGUI I get this for track X.

      Encoder delay: 576 samples
      Padded at end: 0 samples
      Music length: 3,153,416 bytes.

      If however I first rip to another lossless format and then do the conversion as a seperate step I get the following for track X:

      Encoder delay: 576 samples
      Padded at end: 1,764 samples
      Music length: 3,155,270 bytes

      Now what's interesting is that do the same rip using EAC and the lame exe I get the same:

      Encoder delay: 576 samples
      Padded at end: 1,764 samples
      Music length: 3,155,270 bytes

      The reason I started looking into this was because I wondered if dBpowerAMP did anything similar to the "synchronise between tracks" feature in EAC.
      Last edited by cubiq; March 29, 2007, 08:39 PM.

      Comment

      • jmourik

        • Jun 2007
        • 2

        #18
        Re: LAME -V0 --vbr-new equivilant setting

        Slightly confused now...

        So will dMc
        Target Quality (VBR) + -V 0 "extreme" + Encoding: Slow (High Quality)
        result in
        "LAME -V0 --vbr-new"?

        Is it the same to all intents and purposes?

        jan

        Comment

        • LtData
          dBpoweramp Guru

          • May 2004
          • 8288

          #19
          Re: LAME -V0 --vbr-new equivilant setting

          Yes, all VBR settings are the --vbr-new, I'm not sure how the encoding setting affects the command-line, though.

          If you are using r12.1, it says "--vbr-new".

          Comment

          • jmourik

            • Jun 2007
            • 2

            #20
            Re: LAME -V0 --vbr-new equivilant setting

            Thanks, I just upgraded to 12.1 and now I see it!
            So what difference does "Encoding: slow/normal/fast" make, within "-v0 --vbr-new"?

            jan

            Comment

            Working...

            ]]>