1) I would like to know if I could make a one purchase for $30 and use the
software on both Windows and Mac as I use the two interchangeably on a Macbook
Pro (Bootcamp and Parallels)? Or do I have to purchase twice, one for Mac and one for
Windows as I decide which OS is better accomplishing goal of re-ripping a 1200+ CD collection.
I used iTunes to rip to .wav using the Mac ... now I want to try out using .flac
and may just use Windows to do this.
2) In the Encoder section/tab, is there an advantage of ripping the .flac files as
lossless uncompressed as opposed to lossless level 8? I noticed that the resulting
.flac file as uncompressed has a comparable size to the .wav files I am used to
or even .aiff and I would prefer that. Of course I could save space using the
compressed level 8 (default is 5), but would that require more processing of the
flac player to use "uncompressing" algorithms to get back the original audio file?
I do not care for disk capacity issues and so far I am using .wav on various
hard drives (the master copy or source) and flash drives and microSD cards that I may use
in car stereos (FAT32 or exFAT formatted 64 GB storage media ).
For me 1 USB3.0 64GB flash drive can hold about 1400 + or - .wav files which is
sufficient for my purposes.
I may want to explore re-ripping my 1200 CD collection to .flac as it can hold the
meta data and I can see the album cover images on the Sony or Pioneer
car stereo systems. I am not sure if I can view the same images using .wav files.
I am just now exploring the usage of .flac now.
Thank you.
TC
software on both Windows and Mac as I use the two interchangeably on a Macbook
Pro (Bootcamp and Parallels)? Or do I have to purchase twice, one for Mac and one for
Windows as I decide which OS is better accomplishing goal of re-ripping a 1200+ CD collection.
I used iTunes to rip to .wav using the Mac ... now I want to try out using .flac
and may just use Windows to do this.
2) In the Encoder section/tab, is there an advantage of ripping the .flac files as
lossless uncompressed as opposed to lossless level 8? I noticed that the resulting
.flac file as uncompressed has a comparable size to the .wav files I am used to
or even .aiff and I would prefer that. Of course I could save space using the
compressed level 8 (default is 5), but would that require more processing of the
flac player to use "uncompressing" algorithms to get back the original audio file?
I do not care for disk capacity issues and so far I am using .wav on various
hard drives (the master copy or source) and flash drives and microSD cards that I may use
in car stereos (FAT32 or exFAT formatted 64 GB storage media ).
For me 1 USB3.0 64GB flash drive can hold about 1400 + or - .wav files which is
sufficient for my purposes.
I may want to explore re-ripping my 1200 CD collection to .flac as it can hold the
meta data and I can see the album cover images on the Sony or Pioneer
car stereo systems. I am not sure if I can view the same images using .wav files.
I am just now exploring the usage of .flac now.
Thank you.
TC
Comment