title
Products            Buy            Support Forum            Professional            About            Codec Central
 

Defective Disc: unreadable @ 8x speed, no errors @ Maximum?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dvdr
    dBpoweramp Enthusiast

    • Sep 2008
    • 235

    Defective Disc: unreadable @ 8x speed, no errors @ Maximum?

    I usually rip with a Plextor 1210a and 230a at 8x speed (AR-Rip + min. 2 secure reads) to ensure a proper read.
    I encountered a ripping problem with a really badly damaged disc - 13.000 and more frames to rerip, giving up after 30 unrecoverable frames. Shutting off "mark as error" the resulting files of 3 tracks stuttered with heavy dropouts.
    I put the CD into a LiteOn Lightscribe DVD-burner with the same settings and set the read speed to maximum - NO frames to rerip! Setting the read-speed to 24, 12, 8 resulted in errors again - the slower the speed, the more frames to rerip.

    :confused::confused:

    Unfortunately, the CD is not in the AR database, so I have no clue, whether the max-speed-LiteOn rip is accurate.
    But listening to the ripped tracks, at least no stutter or dropouts are audible, they seem to be fine, not even distortion in those 40-seconds-plus long sections, that used to stutter

    So: is there any explanation for this? Shouldn't slower ripping speeds enable a laser to stay better "in focus" and pick up "track" after defective zones more easily? Is there a common recommendation of ripping speeds (talking about things like higher jitter at high ripping speeds)?

    Thanks!
    Last edited by dvdr; February 02, 2009, 07:34 AM.
  • Spoon
    Administrator
    • Apr 2002
    • 44509

    #2
    Re: Defective Disc: unreadable @ 8x speed, no errors @ Maximum?

    No often with modern CD drives a slower speed makes it more difficult for the disc to be read.
    Spoon
    www.dbpoweramp.com

    Comment

    • bhoar
      dBpoweramp Guru

      • Sep 2006
      • 1173

      #3
      Re: Defective Disc: unreadable @ 8x speed, no errors @ Maximum?

      In addition, the Lite-On might have a very good "cover up errors" algorithm. That is, you know you're not getting an accurate rip, but you're getting one that sounds less bad.

      -brendan

      Comment

      Working...

      ]]>