title
Products            Buy            Support Forum            Professional            About            Codec Central
 

Track Number "not" populated by Ripper

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • NPendrigh
    • Aug 2008
    • 27

    Track Number "not" populated by Ripper

    I am using Ref 13.0.0.2 to rip CD's

    Unfortunately, I am having issues with Track Number. What is my evidence?

    1. Windows Media Player 11 sometimes does not pick up the track number when the newly ripped CD is added to its library
    2. Logitech's Slim Devices's SqueezeCenter 7.1 or 7.2 never pick up the track number - the tracks are always listed in alphabetical order
    3. Using Windows XP SP2 Explorer, I can view some metaTag columns automatically and I can add more by right-clicking on the column heading. There are 2 columns with the name 'Track Number'. The column that matters IMO near the top of the column list in between Year and Genre is empty. It is the one near the bottom of the list in between Album and Genre reached after clicking More... that is populated

    Track Number is the most painful example - it occurs for Year and Genre as well

    What has to happen to fix this?

    All suggestion welcome and thank you in advance
    Nigel

    PS WMP can rip and populate the tags as I would expect and there are no problems with track order in either WMP or the Squeezebox
    Last edited by NPendrigh; September 07, 2008, 02:22 PM.
  • LtData
    dBpoweramp Guru
    • May 2004
    • 8288

    #2
    Re: Track Number "not" populated by Ripper

    Try the r13.1 beta (link in my signature) and the WMA R6 beta codec here: http://forum.dbpoweramp.com/showthread.php?t=16523

    Edit: I think your "13.0.0.2" is the same as r13.1, but use dBpoweramp Configuration to verify.

    Comment

    • Spoon
      Administrator
      • Apr 2002
      • 44044

      #3
      Re: Track Number "not" populated by Ripper

      Did you change the WMA track writing options in 'dBpoweramp Configuration' >> Codecs >> Advanced?

      Just tried in WMP and Vista both display the track number.
      Last edited by Spoon; September 07, 2008, 08:47 PM.
      Spoon
      www.dbpoweramp.com

      Comment

      • NPendrigh
        • Aug 2008
        • 27

        #4
        Re: Track Number "not" populated by Ripper

        No, I did not change the WMA writing options. They are set to:
        Wave ID Tagging
        Tag Creation - (default - LIST & ID3)
        LIST Chunk Position - [data][LIST]
        LIST Album Tag - IPRD
        LIST Track Tag - ITRK
        LIST Padding Type - 'JUNK' Chunk
        LIST Padding Size - 2KB
        ID3v2 Version - v2.3
        ID3v2 Text Encodong - ANSI

        Is this what you would expect?


        Music Converter Configuration Options - Windows Explorer Integration
        Deselecting 'Enable Explorer Columns' has removed the duplicate column entries in Windows Explorer

        After this I rebooted the computer and re-ripped a CD and I still have the same issue - the track number and other meta data columns in Windows Explorer are empty
        The meta data appears correctly in the yellow pop up window when hovering the cursor over the file in Windows Explorer and also when right-clicking and Edit-ID Tag
        Last edited by NPendrigh; September 08, 2008, 02:29 AM. Reason: Additional Information

        Comment

        • LtData
          dBpoweramp Guru
          • May 2004
          • 8288

          #5
          Re: Track Number "not" populated by Ripper

          You put in the Wave ID tagging settings, not the WMA settings. They are below the WAV settings and are labeled "Windows Media Audio ID Tagging".

          Comment

          • NPendrigh
            • Aug 2008
            • 27

            #6
            Re: Track Number "not" populated by Ripper

            Thank you

            I do not have any WMA settings to provide

            Under the "ID Tagging" heading there are only two sub-headings:
            - mp3 ID Tagging
            - Wave ID Tagging

            The next heading is "Decoder Options"

            PS I have been using v13.1 beta for all of this thread
            Last edited by NPendrigh; September 08, 2008, 03:53 AM.

            Comment

            • Spoon
              Administrator
              • Apr 2002
              • 44044

              #7
              Re: Track Number "not" populated by Ripper

              Reinstall the WMA Codec from codec central, it looks like you are missing the decoder which does the tagging.
              Spoon
              www.dbpoweramp.com

              Comment

              • NPendrigh
                • Aug 2008
                • 27

                #8
                Re: Track Number "not" populated by Ripper

                Yes - that has worked - thank you very much both of you :smile2:

                Comment

                • advr
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 10

                  #9
                  Re: Track Number "not" populated by Ripper

                  hello,

                  I am trying everything but with squezecenter I still get the numbers alplabetical?

                  what else can I check?

                  regards,

                  Ad.
                  (The Netherlands)

                  Comment

                  • advr
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 10

                    #10
                    Re: Track Number "not" populated by Ripper

                    When I ripp to flac, it does work, but if I rip to wav, I get the alphabetical order.:blush:
                    so maybe to tagging on wav files is not working the way I want:komisch9:

                    Comment

                    • Spoon
                      Administrator
                      • Apr 2002
                      • 44044

                      #11
                      Re: Track Number "not" populated by Ripper

                      Squeezecenter will not read wave tags.
                      Spoon
                      www.dbpoweramp.com

                      Comment

                      Working...

                      ]]>