title
Products            Buy            Support Forum            Professional            About            Codec Central
 
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 65

Thread: PerfectTUNES R2 discussion

  1. #16

    Re: PerfectTUNES R2 discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by Spoon View Post
    Until the next update, ...
    Will R2 still be limited by only offering fullscreen mode?

  2. #17
    Administrator
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    39,385

    Re: PerfectTUNES R2 discussion

    Press the Square icon next to X in top right, then can resize how like. Certain programs might need you to restart after resizing.

  3. #18

    Re: PerfectTUNES R2 discussion

    Wanted to know if there is a current build to test? I am looking to clean up a bunch of albums I ripped last year with DBPA. Hoping this might help!

  4. #19
    Administrator
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    39,385

    Re: PerfectTUNES R2 discussion

    There is no automated tagging.

  5. #20

    Re: PerfectTUNES R2 discussion

    But will it help me with albums that have tagging problems? Like reconciling when meta data sources have different info?

  6. #21

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    5

    Re: PerfectTUNES R2 discussion

    R2 has been working very well for me. Today I got to this point after added some new albums

    "Listening to Library - track 49264 of 49284"

    I've tried Album Art and AcurateRip, both stuck here. Scanner.exe in the processes for task manager. I unloaded scanner.exe and restarted, but it gets stuck at the same place.
    Last edited by camelx; 01-23-2015 at 04:21 PM.

  7. #22

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    5

    Re: PerfectTUNES R2 discussion

    Okay, sorry for trouble, it's okay now.

    Not sure, but decided to reboot and try again. It's flew right past the 49264 and is running normally!

  8. #23

    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    16

    Re: PerfectTUNES R2 discussion

    Newest beta gets again a SONAR (SONAR.Heuristic.120) warning from Norton and is deleted

  9. #24

    Re: PerfectTUNES R2 discussion

    Could it be that the new download link (Updated 31st March Beta 4) still downloads the version from January? At least I do not get any Binary difference between both versions and the files inside the exe have a date of Jan 18.

  10. #25
    dBpoweramp Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    937

    Re: PerfectTUNES R2 discussion

    I have re-issued the install, it will show as beta 4a when installing.

  11. #26

    Re: PerfectTUNES R2 discussion

    ??? I downloaded the .exe file again (http://www.dbpoweramp.com/beta/PerfectTUNES-r2-beta.exe) but it still shows me that I have version 3 installed, which it will uninstall to install version 3. No sight of beta 4a anywhere....

  12. #27
    dBpoweramp Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    937

    Re: PerfectTUNES R2 discussion

    I have updated the install to include 64 bit native, note the new download link.

  13. #28

    Re: PerfectTUNES R2 discussion

    Quote Originally Posted by ********* View Post
    I have updated the install to include 64 bit native, note the new download link.
    Thanks, now it updated to Beta4a.

  14. #29

    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Lafayette, IN
    Posts
    24

    Re: PerfectTUNES R2 discussion

    I have been testing this new version using the 64-bit binaries. I must say vasty improved in speed in my testing. Since my library contains a few hundred high-resolution albums I specifically wanted to test the ability to "Skip non-lossless" so I could just scan my library as it exists without removing the high-res albums. What I notice is that for about half of these albums this version will mark 1 or sometimes a couple of tracks as corrupt. I am fairly certain they are not corrupt and found no redbook audio tracks marked corrupt strictly hi-res. I would be glad to submit a few tracks if it helps you determine why they are being marked as corrupted - I would think the program should just ignore them since they are no 44.1/16 as it seemed to do with the majority of them.

  15. #30
    Administrator
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    39,385

    Re: PerfectTUNES R2 discussion

    Which title is assigned to these tracks?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •