illustrate
Products            Buy            Support Forum            Registrations            Professional            About           
 

Asset UPnP R2025 beta.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Spoon
    replied
    Re: Asset UPnP R2024 beta

    We were getting zero feedback on Windows betas for Asset.

    Leave a comment:


  • vilsen
    replied
    Re: Asset UPnP R2024 beta

    I respect your decision, but may I ask why this has changed? Until recently the windows version was the prioritized one with betas coming first.

    Leave a comment:


  • Spoon
    replied
    Re: Asset UPnP R2024 beta

    Only the final for windows.

    Leave a comment:


  • vilsen
    replied
    Re: Asset UPnP R2024 beta

    Thanks for the new features, especially the amended [SimpleArtist]. Will there not be a Windows beta, only the final version? Just curious (don't want to push anything if it delays the final version). We want to test [SimpleArtist] on a Cambridge streamer.

    Leave a comment:


  • craigmcg1965
    replied
    Re: Asset UPnP R2024 beta

    Originally posted by PeterP
    Download link fixed.
    Thanks - beta downloaded, installed, and now updating databases/libraries.

    Leave a comment:


  • PeterP
    replied
    Re: Asset UPnP R2024 beta

    Download link fixed.

    Leave a comment:


  • craigmcg1965
    replied
    Re: Asset UPnP R2024 beta

    Thanks for the quick fix but I'm getting a 404 for the new Synology build.Click image for larger version

Name:	Synology NAS Build 404.png
Views:	1
Size:	18.5 KB
ID:	294742I'll try again later.

    Leave a comment:


  • PeterP
    replied
    Re: Asset UPnP R2024 beta

    Originally posted by craigmcg1965
    Hi PeterP, If your reply about DSM 6.x was to me, my DS1821+ was running DSM Version: 7.2.1-69057 Update 3 for the first 2 times I tried to install this beta and Version: 7.2.1-69057 Update 4 the last two times I tried to install it.
    Fixed in today's build, thanks for reporting.

    Leave a comment:


  • craigmcg1965
    replied
    Re: Asset UPnP R2024 beta

    Hi PeterP, If your reply about DSM 6.x was to me, my DS1821+ was running DSM Version: 7.2.1-69057 Update 3 for the first 2 times I tried to install this beta and Version: 7.2.1-69057 Update 4 the last two times I tried to install it.

    Leave a comment:


  • PeterP
    replied
    Re: Asset UPnP R2024 beta

    Asset no longer supports Synology DSM 6.x, because I don't have a DSM6 machine to test Asset on, and there's no downgrade path from DSM 7.x.
    Please stick with old Asset versions if you run DSM 6.x.

    Leave a comment:


  • craigmcg1965
    replied
    Re: Asset UPnP R2024 beta

    I've tried downloading and installing at least 3 times and still get the same error. Here's a screenshot showing the consistent file size between two downloaded files. Could the Synology file be corrupt?Click image for larger version

Name:	Same file size for Synology NAS.png
Views:	1
Size:	6.5 KB
ID:	294741

    Leave a comment:


  • Spoon
    replied
    Re: Asset UPnP R2024 beta

    Try downloading it again, you might only have half the install.

    Leave a comment:


  • craigmcg1965
    replied
    Re: Asset UPnP R2024 beta

    I get the error screenshotted below when I try to update it on my Synology NAS running DSM 7.2

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Synology NAS install error.png
Views:	1
Size:	15.4 KB
ID:	294740

    Leave a comment:


  • simes_pep
    replied
    Re: Asset UPnP R2024 beta

    Installed on RPi2 (32-bit ARM), rescanning of entire library was certainly faster with r8 structure.
    Noticed some new settings, namely &*8220;Fill missing Album Artist tags&*8221;.
    Will advise, as library changes and changes are picked up.
    Thanks, Simon

    Leave a comment:


  • PeterP
    replied
    Re: Asset UPnP R2024 beta

    Regarding [SimpleArtist]-
    I made it send just dc:creator and strip everything else. Since that doesn't work for your control point, I'm changing it to send upnp:artist instead, per old discussion.

    Regarding ={no-identification}
    It has been this way since at least 2017, I can't just change it, it would suddenly change behaviors of existing working configurations.
    We're changing the doc to say the right thing.
    Last edited by PeterP; February 09, 2024, 01:40 PM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...