PerfectTUNES R2 discussion

[SirAtilla]

Re: PerfectTUNES R2 discussion

they play perfectly fine so I am talking just about how PerfectTUNES R2 reports the files. I think this is false positive honestly.

[Spoon]

Re: PerfectTUNES R2 discussion

It is possible they are corrupted some how, can other programs play them? how about foobar 2000?

[SirAtilla]

Re: PerfectTUNES R2 discussion

They are FLAC files?

Thanks for clarifying - these are all in Apple Lossless format. I do have the FLAC equivalents but am not scanning them. I used at the time XLD to convert them from FLAC to Apple Lossless.

[Spoon]

Re: PerfectTUNES R2 discussion

They are FLAC files?

[SirAtilla]

Re: PerfectTUNES R2 discussion

Which title is assigned to these tracks?

Hi - if this is directed to me not sure I understand? They are in category of "corrupt file"

[Spoon]

Re: PerfectTUNES R2 discussion

Which title is assigned to these tracks?

[SirAtilla]

Re: PerfectTUNES R2 discussion

I have been testing this new version using the 64-bit binaries. I must say vasty improved in speed in my testing. Since my library contains a few hundred high-resolution albums I specifically wanted to test the ability to "Skip non-lossless" so I could just scan my library as it exists without removing the high-res albums. What I notice is that for about half of these albums this version will mark 1 or sometimes a couple of tracks as corrupt. I am fairly certain they are not corrupt and found no redbook audio tracks marked corrupt strictly hi-res. I would be glad to submit a few tracks if it helps you determine why they are being marked as corrupted - I would think the program should just ignore them since they are no 44.1/16 as it seemed to do with the majority of them.

[Mat_Illustrate]

Re: PerfectTUNES R2 discussion

I have updated the install to include 64 bit native, note the new download link.

Thanks, now it updated to Beta4a.

[dbfan]

Re: PerfectTUNES R2 discussion

I have updated the install to include 64 bit native, note the new download link.

[Mat_Illustrate]

Re: PerfectTUNES R2 discussion

??? I downloaded the .exe file again (http://www.dbpoweramp.com/beta/PerfectTUNES-r2-beta.exe) but it still shows me that I have version 3 installed, which it will uninstall to install version 3. No sight of beta 4a anywhere....

[dbfan]

Re: PerfectTUNES R2 discussion

I have re-issued the install, it will show as beta 4a when installing.

[Mat_Illustrate]

Re: PerfectTUNES R2 discussion

Could it be that the new download link (Updated 31st March Beta 4) still downloads the version from January? At least I do not get any Binary difference between both versions and the files inside the exe have a date of Jan 18.

[kaum]

Re: PerfectTUNES R2 discussion

Newest beta gets again a SONAR (SONAR.Heuristic.120) warning from Norton and is deleted

[camelx]

Re: PerfectTUNES R2 discussion

Okay, sorry for trouble, it's okay now.

Not sure, but decided to reboot and try again. It's flew right past the 49264 and is running normally!

[camelx]

Re: PerfectTUNES R2 discussion

R2 has been working very well for me. Today I got to this point after added some new albums

"Listening to Library - track 49264 of 49284"

I've tried Album Art and AcurateRip, both stuck here. Scanner.exe in the processes for task manager. I unloaded scanner.exe and restarted, but it gets stuck at the same place.