illustrate
Products            Buy            Support Forum            Registrations            About           
 

Naming Scheme tutorial feedback

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Chip
    replied
    Re: Problem with [IF!EQUALS]

    I have sent the email as requested.

    Leave a comment:


  • Spoon-
    replied
    Re: Problem with [IF!EQUALS]

    Send your order number please to:

    Leave a comment:


  • Chip
    replied
    Problem with [IF!EQUALS]

    I have a problem that when I use the [IF!EQUALS] operator. I am not getting the expected results.
    Tag and Value
    [album artist] is set to Allman Brothers Band, The
    [artist] is set to Allman Brothers Band, The

    I copied the following from the Naming SET button by checking the Current CD Meta box.

    my code
    [IFVALUE]album artist,[album artist],Various Artists[]\[album]\[album artist] - [album] - [IFMULTI] Disc [disc] - [][track] - [title][IF!EQUALS][artist],[album artist], - [artist][]

    my results
    Allman Brothers Band, The\Hittin' the Note\Allman Brothers Band, The - Hittin' the Note - 02 - High Cost of Low Living - Allman Brothers Band, The

    From my understanding of the operator the last artist name in the results should not be there.
    If I change [IF!EQUALS] to [IFEQUALS] the last artist name does not appear.
    This seems opposite to how I understand the operators.

    What am I missing?

    Thanks,
    Chip

    Leave a comment:


  • LtData
    replied
    Re: Spoon & LtData's personal naming schemes?

    My current one:
    [IF!COMP][IFVALUE]album artist,[album artist],[artist][]\[][album][IFMULTI] - Disc [disc][]\[track] - [artist] - [title]

    Leave a comment:


  • Spoon-
    replied
    Re: Spoon & LtData's personal naming schemes?

    My current one is the one if you click [default]

    Leave a comment:


  • Kim K.
    replied
    Spoon & LtData's personal naming schemes?

    1- Spoon and LtData - could you please post your current personal naming schemes? LtData's, I see your scheme above but I would very much appreciate getting your latest iteration.

    2- Do you different schemes for particular scenarios (e.g., multiple artists, compilation)? Sorry about my beginner's question. Figuring out naming has kept me from starting my rip session.

    Thank you

    Leave a comment:


  • Spoon-
    replied
    Re: Naming Scheme tutorial feedback

    The naming scheme is not c++

    Leave a comment:


  • LowWaterMark
    replied
    Re: Naming Scheme tutorial feedback

    As a follow up to my original inquiry above, I understand that dBpoweramp is written in C++ programming language. Is the naming scheme also written in C++ or is it a dialect thereof or completely different? I'm unsure if Vorbis Comments is a subset of C++ or unrelated. I have read the Ogg Vorbis Documentation at Xiph and this associated website re Ogg Vorbis as well as this C++ tutorial for non-programmers. As to the big picture I am still confused.

    I'm trying to understand the logic behind the naming scheme and am looking to teach myself that language (or language dialect). I wish to become somewhat functional in the language. I'd like to get past my present strategy, which is to copy/paste others' naming schemes.

    I'm not asking you to alleviate my ignorance. I'm asking to be directed to a tutorial of sorts so that I can educate myself.
    Last edited by LowWaterMark; July 28, 2008, 08:54 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • LowWaterMark
    replied
    Re: Naming Scheme tutorial feedback

    I just finished my third time through your tutorial. Thank you for the wonderful effort. I am left with a question most likely stemming my fragile literacy with computers.

    given:
    [IFVALUE]composer,[composer],[artist][]
    is it not possible to have a composer and key soloist in the naming scheme? Say you have a CD of Yo-Yo Ma performing Bach (e.g. Simply Baroque/ Yo-Yo Ma. Does one have to choose between composer and artist?

    I'm struggling a bit here. Could you take a moment to include a naming scheme for a symphonic CD, with, for example, the following hierarchical fields simplified from the Amazon.com example above (forgive my fabrication in that it is in truth a single CD package, not a set of two):
    1. composer (Johann Sebastian Bach)
    2. orchestra (Amsterdam Baroque Orchestra)
    3. soloist (Yo-Yo Ma)
    4. conductor (Ton Koopman)
    5. disc 1 (of 2)
    6. symphony (Orchestral Suite No. 3 in D major)
    7. movement (Air on a G String)
    Last edited by LowWaterMark; July 27, 2008, 10:39 AM. Reason: typo

    Leave a comment:


  • Spoon-
    replied
    Re: Naming Scheme tutorial feedback

    We do, but everyone is different.

    Leave a comment:


  • poetryrocksalot
    replied
    Re: Naming Scheme tutorial feedback

    Why don't you just implement the mostly used naming settings into default choices for the ripper.

    Leave a comment:


  • LtData
    replied
    Re: Help with code.

    Your naming scheme looks like it will do that, yes.

    Leave a comment:


  • jongig
    replied
    Help with code.

    I have started ripping CDs into Flac and I've notioced a few differences between Flac and WMA lossless. I don't have album art in the WMA folders so I guess each file has it built in. Is this a good idea or not since DBP is not doing it this way?

    I'm not into programming and really don't want to learn this stuff but I guess I have to to some degree. What I noticed was that the program is just saving all the sogs from an artist in one folder and only retreiving the cover art for the first disc ripped. I like the way WMP does it and like the cascading folders, i.e. Bon Jovi as a folder and then albums/folders within that folder.

    This code listed above, is this the correct code and can I just do a copy/paste and use it and will it do as I'm discussing?

    [IFCOMP][IFVALUE]album artist,[album artist],Various Artists[]\[album][IFMULTI] Disc [disc][]\[track] [artist] - [title][][IF!COMP][IFVALUE]album artist,[album artist],[artist][]\[album]\[artist] - [album][IFMULTI] Disc [disc][] - [track] - [title][]

    Leave a comment:


  • LtData
    replied
    Re: Naming Scheme tutorial feedback

    I don't know of any advantage of having your audio files on the same level. I do know this means that if you use dMC, you will only get one album art file for the folder.

    Leave a comment:


  • Magnus_CA
    replied
    Re: Naming Scheme tutorial feedback

    Originally posted by LtData
    Magnus: Change "\[album]\" to "\[album][IFMULTI] Disc [disc][]\"
    Thanks. Again, is there any advantage to having all of your audio files on the same folder level? I can see this approach will bury all multidisc songs down a directory. Just trying to cover all bases since this archiving job will probably rule my life for the next week.

    Leave a comment:

Working...