illustrate
Products            Buy            Support Forum            Registrations            About           
 

Padded Compilation Tag

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • garym
    replied
    Re: Padded Compilation Tag

    Originally posted by BOOTP
    Fair point. I generally go for a more minimalist approach with tags so might just ditch this tag anyway as not sure I have it 'correctly' assigned anyway. In reading other threads, it does seem the definition of what makes a 'compilation' is rather loose; plus I will not be using iTunes.
    Some don't use this tag. For many, use of ALBUM ARTIST is more important in the case of albums with differing artists (what some would call a compilation)

    Leave a comment:


  • BOOTP
    replied
    Re: Padded Compilation Tag

    Originally posted by garym
    not sure. I use "facets" as my interface with foobar2000 and I have a column where I can show compilations (or not), so I can see that it is picking up my compilation tag and listing albums appropriately. But I'd say that this is irrelevant. Even if foobar2000 works with this (currently), why would you want your files to have something coded incorrectly in a tag field.
    Fair point. I generally go for a more minimalist approach with tags so might just ditch this tag anyway as not sure I have it 'correctly' assigned anyway. In reading other threads, it does seem the definition of what makes a 'compilation' is rather loose; plus I will not be using iTunes.

    Leave a comment:


  • garym
    replied
    Re: Padded Compilation Tag

    Originally posted by BOOTP
    Thanks Gary - is there a way in general (using foobar2000) to check compilation tags are working properly? When I look at my Album List I just see options like 'by folder structure', 'by artist/album', etc.
    not sure. I use "facets" as my interface with foobar2000 and I have a column where I can show compilations (or not), so I can see that it is picking up my compilation tag and listing albums appropriately. But I'd say that this is irrelevant. Even if foobar2000 works with this (currently), why would you want your files to have something coded incorrectly in a tag field.

    Leave a comment:


  • BOOTP
    replied
    Re: Padded Compilation Tag

    Originally posted by garym
    might work, but I'd fix if it was me. COMPILATION tag field either should exist with a value of "1" or not exist at all.
    Thanks Gary - is there a way in general (using foobar2000) to check compilation tags are working properly? When I look at my Album List I just see options like 'by folder structure', 'by artist/album', etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • garym
    replied
    Re: Padded Compilation Tag

    Originally posted by BOOTP
    Hi.

    I find tagging, and making improvements to tagging a never ending process, and today I noticed my Compilation tags (where used) are actually padded to '01' instead of '1'.

    I assume the Compilation is a simple Boolean but was wondering if '01' would still work correctly? I use foobar2000, but was unsure how to evidence the compilation tag is actually working in the player?

    I could script a simple reformat of the value if needed, but I kind of like all the numbers being padded.

    Thanks.
    might work, but I'd fix if it was me. COMPILATION tag field either should exist with a value of "1" or not exist at all.

    Leave a comment:


  • BOOTP
    started a topic Padded Compilation Tag

    Padded Compilation Tag

    Hi.

    I find tagging, and making improvements to tagging a never ending process, and today I noticed my Compilation tags (where used) are actually padded to '01' instead of '1'.

    I assume the Compilation is a simple Boolean but was wondering if '01' would still work correctly? I use foobar2000, but was unsure how to evidence the compilation tag is actually working in the player?

    I could script a simple reformat of the value if needed, but I kind of like all the numbers being padded.

    Thanks.
Working...