title
Products            Buy            Support Forum            Professional            About            Codec Central
 

missing advanced secure features when using "Windows internal"

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • calestyo

    • Nov 2006
    • 46

    missing advanced secure features when using "Windows internal"

    Hi.

    In the documentation it says:
    Communication offers SCSI, ASPI and Windows Internal, for Windows XP on a limited access user account Windows Internal has to be used, advanced secure options such as C2 pointers will not be available. SCSI is the better option over ASPI as it interfaces directly with the CD drive.

    What are the other unusable "advanced secure options" that would not be available with Windows internal?

    Chris.
  • Spoon
    Administrator
    • Apr 2002
    • 44575

    #2
    Re: missing advanced secure features when using "Windows internal"

    C2 pointers, CD-Text, CD-UPC, CD-ISRC, setting drive speed just to name a few.
    Spoon
    www.dbpoweramp.com

    Comment

    • calestyo

      • Nov 2006
      • 46

      #3
      Re: missing advanced secure features when using "Windows internal"

      Uhm ok,.. thanks,... so I'll simply use the SCSI interface and there schould be no problems.

      Anyway,.. I'm curious: I'm also using EAC (with the native Windows interface, because ASPI seems to work pretty unreliable on my system) but at least CD-Text, CD-UPC, CD-ISRC, setting drive speed seems to work there.

      Is this just a limitation of dmc or is it a limitation of the windows interface?

      Best wishes,
      Chris.

      Comment

      • Spoon
        Administrator
        • Apr 2002
        • 44575

        #4
        Re: missing advanced secure features when using "Windows internal"

        Windows Internal is not used in EAC, EACs native Windows is the same as SCSI Pass Through.
        Spoon
        www.dbpoweramp.com

        Comment

        • calestyo

          • Nov 2006
          • 46

          #5
          Re: missing advanced secure features when using "Windows internal"

          Ah,.. thank you very much :-)

          Comment

          Working...

          ]]>