In a Discogs Database thread, I discovered that there's now a policy to use indexed tracks for classical recordings, here: https://support.discogs.com/hc/artic...isting*12.13.1
But that means there are effectively no track numbers for very many classical recordings that have movements within works. Here's an example: https://www.discogs.com/Beethoven-Ch...elease/3370339
In turn that means that when doing a Manual Metadata search,even though the album is there in plain sight, dBpoweramp ripper returns a blank for the album when it reads the URL, presumably because it can't find any track numbers.
I've raised a thread in the Discogs Development forum but get the feeling they aren't likely to change their policy. Would it be possible to amend the ripper code to identify the indexed track references please?
But that means there are effectively no track numbers for very many classical recordings that have movements within works. Here's an example: https://www.discogs.com/Beethoven-Ch...elease/3370339
In turn that means that when doing a Manual Metadata search,even though the album is there in plain sight, dBpoweramp ripper returns a blank for the album when it reads the URL, presumably because it can't find any track numbers.
I've raised a thread in the Discogs Development forum but get the feeling they aren't likely to change their policy. Would it be possible to amend the ripper code to identify the indexed track references please?
Comment