title
Products            Buy            Support Forum            Professional            About            Codec Central
 

Quality differences after ripping

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Tel19

    • Jan 2017
    • 3

    Quality differences after ripping

    I have just started ripping my CD collection and I am finding that I can hear a drop in quality between the original CD and the rip to FLAC. Is this just because the DAC in the CD player is different from the one in the sound card on the computer or do I need to tweak the settings while ripping to improve the quality?

    Thanks
  • jultsu
    dBpoweramp Enthusiast

    • Mar 2016
    • 58

    #2
    Re: Quality differences after ripping

    Originally posted by Tel19
    Is this just because the DAC in the CD player is different from the one in the sound card
    Most probably yes, but listing out your audio setup would help tremendously.

    Comment

    • garym
      dBpoweramp Guru

      • Nov 2007
      • 5888

      #3
      Re: Quality differences after ripping

      FLAC is lossless. So it will sound the same as the original CD. But of course, as jultsu noted, you'd have to be playing the FLAC through the same DAC and playback system as the CD in order to actually compare. My computer playback via PC soundcard doesn't sound near as good as listening to the same files on my main system. Also, when comparing make sure you keep volume the same in both playbacks. Even an imperceptible higher volume on playback can make the higher volume audio be perceived as "better".

      Comment

      • Tel19

        • Jan 2017
        • 3

        #4
        Re: Quality differences after ripping

        Both the CD player and the computer are playing through the same system (Denon amp, Celestion Ditton 33 speakers) the only difference is the DAC. They are both attached to a Numac mixer, the CD via standard HQ phono and the computer via USB (so the Numac mixer is providing the DAC from the computer, not a sound card).

        I am asking the question because I have ripped the original CD and downloaded 2 or 3 different FLAC rips (presumably also from the original CD but ripped by different software and hardware) and can hear the difference between the FLAC versions (and of course this is using the same DAC to play each).

        Comment

        • garym
          dBpoweramp Guru

          • Nov 2007
          • 5888

          #5
          Re: Quality differences after ripping

          Originally posted by Tel19
          Both the CD player and the computer are playing through the same system (Denon amp, Celestion Ditton 33 speakers) the only difference is the DAC. They are both attached to a Numac mixer, the CD via standard HQ phono and the computer via USB (so the Numac mixer is providing the DAC from the computer, not a sound card).

          I am asking the question because I have ripped the original CD and downloaded 2 or 3 different FLAC rips (presumably also from the original CD but ripped by different software and hardware) and can hear the difference between the FLAC versions (and of course this is using the same DAC to play each).
          very strange. Try playing them all through the same DAC, volume leveled. Note that many CD players have "hot" outputs that increase volume over other sources.

          Comment

          • mville
            dBpoweramp Guru

            • Dec 2008
            • 4021

            #6
            Re: Quality differences after ripping

            Originally posted by Tel19
            Both the CD player and the computer are playing through the same system (Denon amp, Celestion Ditton 33 speakers) the only difference is the DAC. They are both attached to a Numac mixer, the CD via standard HQ phono and the computer via USB (so the Numac mixer is providing the DAC from the computer, not a sound card).
            The CD player DAC and the Numac DAC are different, hence you are hearing the difference between the 2 DACs. The Numac mixer is getting an analog source from the CD and (I assume) a digital source from the PC via USB.

            Originally posted by Tel19
            I am asking the question because I have ripped the original CD and downloaded 2 or 3 different FLAC rips (presumably also from the original CD but ripped by different software and hardware) and can hear the difference between the FLAC versions (and of course this is using the same DAC to play each).
            So to confirm, you have 3 flac versions of the same album? These may be different releases though, of the same album e.g. remastered vs. non-remastered versions. To check whether the flacs are originating from the same audio files, download and install the Calculate Audio CRC utility codec. Then, using dBpoweramp Batch Converter, run this against the flac files and a temporary CRC32/MD5 text file is displayed. The CRC is generated from the audio data and if the audio files are identical, the CRC will be identical.
            Last edited by mville; January 16, 2017, 06:05 PM. Reason: use Calculate Audio CRC utility codec

            Comment

            • Tel19

              • Jan 2017
              • 3

              #7
              Re: Quality differences after ripping

              Thanks for the comments. I hadn't thought about different releases of the same album; that is almost certainly why the various FLAC downloads sound different.

              I have been playing with the settings on each channel of the mixer and now have both the CD version and the ripped FLAC version sounding almost identical. I think they are never going to sound exactly the same because of the different DACs but the quality is now close enough that I am satisfied that the FLAC version is a suitable replacement for the original CD.

              Thanks again for the suggestions.

              Comment

              • jultsu
                dBpoweramp Enthusiast

                • Mar 2016
                • 58

                #8
                Re: Quality differences after ripping

                Some rips might have replaygain enabled on them.

                Comment

                Working...

                ]]>