Tweet
Hi All,
Just a bit of curiosity on a few Accurate details when someone has a few moments if they know:
1) When an Accurate Rip result is (1) is that one rip before yours or your rip now?
2) I put in a disc, perhaps an "obscure disc" that it initially said was in Accurate Rip, but then asked me for a URL for the disc. I entered the Discogs URL and got the album straight away. When I ripped it, my result was Accurate (1). So, is that my rip that is being compared to another site, or is it one rip before mine?
3) I've had a few rip results with interesting numbers. Like on an album of 12 tracks 7 are Accurate Rip (25) and 5 are Accurate Rip (10). Would this be because of a disagreement of rip accuracy resulting in a lower number of agreements with my rip, or would it be because people ripped only certain tracks from an album resulting in less Accurate Rip results for that track?
Thanks for any info, not serious, just curious.
Cheers
Just a bit of curiosity on a few Accurate details when someone has a few moments if they know:
1) When an Accurate Rip result is (1) is that one rip before yours or your rip now?
2) I put in a disc, perhaps an "obscure disc" that it initially said was in Accurate Rip, but then asked me for a URL for the disc. I entered the Discogs URL and got the album straight away. When I ripped it, my result was Accurate (1). So, is that my rip that is being compared to another site, or is it one rip before mine?
3) I've had a few rip results with interesting numbers. Like on an album of 12 tracks 7 are Accurate Rip (25) and 5 are Accurate Rip (10). Would this be because of a disagreement of rip accuracy resulting in a lower number of agreements with my rip, or would it be because people ripped only certain tracks from an album resulting in less Accurate Rip results for that track?
Thanks for any info, not serious, just curious.
Cheers
Comment