Tweet
I have come across this a second time during rips. The meta track names are different from the cover. Why does this happen? This gives me a very uncomfortable feeling that data is not reliable.
-
Last edited by soongsc; February 12, 2011, 01:59 AM. -
Re: Meta different from cover content
I would suggest you review the meta-data that comes from each of the 4 meta-data providers. AMG results are usually very heavily weighted. Take a screen shot and post the correct meta-data.
How many tracks are on the disc?
Is the artist correct?
Are all the tracks wrong?
The meta-data is not perfect, but its by far and away the best out there.[URL=http://forum.dbpoweramp.com/showthread.php?t=21072]dMC R14.x Requests and Suggestions[/URL]
[url=http://forum.dbpoweramp.com/showthread.php?t=20915]CTDB - Actually Repairs Bad Rips[/url] - Already supported in EAC and CueTools/CueRipper
[URL="http://forum.dbpoweramp.com/showthread.php?t=16750"]PerfectMeta Discussion[/URL].........[URL="http://forum.dbpoweramp.com/showthread.php?p=77937"]PerfectMeta Formatting[/URL]........[url=http://forum.dbpoweramp.com/showthread.php?t=17537]PerfectAlbumArt[/url]
[url=http://forum.dbpoweramp.com/showthread.php?t=19495]Re-Rip Difficult Tracks Across Multiple Drives[/url]
[url=http://forum.dbpoweramp.com/showthread.php?t=17353]Open DSP Architecture[/url] -
Re: Meta different from cover content
Everything is wrong. Even comparing from the providers shown in batch rip match somewhat among themselves, nothing matches what's on the CD cover.Comment
Comment