Would a "mininum AR agreement"-option make sense

[dvdr]

I am just asking myself, how dBpoweramp treats the "agreement" results of AccurateRip. Having a value of (for example) just 2 agreements, I would rather do a secure rip pass than trusting these results. with higher values, I would not doubt.
So my question/suggestion is: please add an option, where I can enter the minimum amount of "agreement"-results from AR, and everything, that's below that get's te secure-rip-options, that are chosen.
What do you think?

[bhoar]

Re: Would a "mininum AR agreement"-option make sense

I am just asking myself, how dBpoweramp treats the "agreement" results of AccurateRip. Having a value of (for example) just 2 agreements, I would rather do a secure rip pass than trusting these results. with higher values, I would not doubt.
So my question/suggestion is: please add an option, where I can enter the minimum amount of "agreement"-results from AR, and everything, that's below that get's te secure-rip-options, that are chosen.
What do you think?

You're asking this in the context of the secure ripper doing only Pass 1 if there's an AR match?

-brendan

[dvdr]

Re: Would a "mininum AR agreement"-option make sense

Yes, Brendan, that's exactly the background of my question. I'd trust AR-results > 2, but "just" 1 or 2 matches I'd rather approve with an "Ultra Secure" run...
Right now, I'd have to manually change options, if there was an automated way to do that by adding the option of "minimum AR matches", that would do the job

[Porcus]

Re: Would a "mininum AR agreement"-option make sense

"Force secure" is already put forth in a couple of the wishlist threads here, and I don't mind a condition on minumum accuracy either, good suggestion. But then maybe one should even have a criterion like "this track has a considerably lower accuracy than anything else on this CD" too -- have a look at http://forum.dbpoweramp.com/showthre...79&mode=linear (which I know, I should have tested a bit more extensively).