Re: Peculiar AcurateRip result
Hi Jean, Spoon, Brendan, Eli and whoever else I know from Hydrogenaudio and/or Digital-Inn.
This situation with EAC is pretty interesting. I'm curious to know what happens when you disable C2 pointers in EAC. When this is done, EAC will ask the drive to access different points within a track. It might also be worthwhile to try the rip in burst mode. Maybe one of these changes will make a difference(?).
Quick explanation (hopefully):
[size=1]Without C2 pointers, EAC reads 27 sectors at a time until 2MB is read and then goes back and does it again. The next pair of 2MB sets will begin with the last 2 sectors of the previous pair for synchronization purposes. With C2 pointers, EAC reads 24 sectors at a time until 2MB is read and then moves on to the next set of 2MB beginning with the last 2 sectors (again for synchronization purposes). If cache flushing is enabled, EAC will read another 2MB prior to moving on to the next 2MB in order to make sure the 2 sectors used for synchronization are read from the disc (with or without the use of C2 pointers).[/size]
My limited understanding of dBpoweramp is that all passes (including ultra-secure) are done in burst mode and that no additional synchronization is used.
Lastly, I am concerned that dBpa is telling you that bad rips are secure when using C2 pointers with your Lite-On. This implies that you're getting consistent errors which are not being dropped by C2 pointers. It should not be behaving this way. I was also going to add that it should be safe to increase the maximum number of re-reads when using C2 pointers, but now have reservations in light this issue.
Hi Jean, Spoon, Brendan, Eli and whoever else I know from Hydrogenaudio and/or Digital-Inn.
This situation with EAC is pretty interesting. I'm curious to know what happens when you disable C2 pointers in EAC. When this is done, EAC will ask the drive to access different points within a track. It might also be worthwhile to try the rip in burst mode. Maybe one of these changes will make a difference(?).
Quick explanation (hopefully):
[size=1]Without C2 pointers, EAC reads 27 sectors at a time until 2MB is read and then goes back and does it again. The next pair of 2MB sets will begin with the last 2 sectors of the previous pair for synchronization purposes. With C2 pointers, EAC reads 24 sectors at a time until 2MB is read and then moves on to the next set of 2MB beginning with the last 2 sectors (again for synchronization purposes). If cache flushing is enabled, EAC will read another 2MB prior to moving on to the next 2MB in order to make sure the 2 sectors used for synchronization are read from the disc (with or without the use of C2 pointers).[/size]
My limited understanding of dBpoweramp is that all passes (including ultra-secure) are done in burst mode and that no additional synchronization is used.
Lastly, I am concerned that dBpa is telling you that bad rips are secure when using C2 pointers with your Lite-On. This implies that you're getting consistent errors which are not being dropped by C2 pointers. It should not be behaving this way. I was also going to add that it should be safe to increase the maximum number of re-reads when using C2 pointers, but now have reservations in light this issue.
Comment