Hello everybody,
I must have read 'most all the forum posts on naming patterns, but after many hours of reading and experimenting, I am still at a loss as how to do what I need to do, and I could really use your help:
I wish to trans-code my lossless archive to a lossy format. Both formats are to occupy the same drive, though each a different folder. If I should specify the new folder into which the newly trans-coded files must go, and use the Dynamic naming convention [origpath]\[origfilename], expectedly, the entire original folder structure is recreated in this specified folder. Instead, I am hoping to avoid this from happening, perhaps by being able to mirror my original stored format, using a custom folder depth, or, folder tree, from thereon to mirror the original? I would also hope to avoid using the original music file tags to perform this- if it all possible.
I do hope I have expressed myself well enough to make sense. Could you assist me, please?
Thank you.
I must have read 'most all the forum posts on naming patterns, but after many hours of reading and experimenting, I am still at a loss as how to do what I need to do, and I could really use your help:
I wish to trans-code my lossless archive to a lossy format. Both formats are to occupy the same drive, though each a different folder. If I should specify the new folder into which the newly trans-coded files must go, and use the Dynamic naming convention [origpath]\[origfilename], expectedly, the entire original folder structure is recreated in this specified folder. Instead, I am hoping to avoid this from happening, perhaps by being able to mirror my original stored format, using a custom folder depth, or, folder tree, from thereon to mirror the original? I would also hope to avoid using the original music file tags to perform this- if it all possible.
I do hope I have expressed myself well enough to make sense. Could you assist me, please?
Thank you.
Comment