title
Products            Buy            Support Forum            Professional            About            Codec Central
 

Track * ordering: 1, 10, 11, 12, 2, 3, ...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ListeningEarth

    • Jun 2018
    • 4

    Track * ordering: 1, 10, 11, 12, 2, 3, ...

    Greetings all!

    Just starting out with Asset - it looks great, very adaptable.

    However (and this is probably my dumb...) Using NAIM app, album tracks list as:
    1.
    10.
    11.
    12.
    2.
    3. and so on

    How do I get tracks to play in correct order? This seems so fundamental I'm sure I've missed something! Is there a configuration setting? Tried a few things to no avail. (I've used other UPnP programs with the NAIM app, and this doesn't happen.)

    Thanks
  • ListeningEarth

    • Jun 2018
    • 4

    #2
    Re: Track * ordering: 1, 10, 11, 12, 2, 3, ...

    Ahh... maybe it'll sort with a rescan. I'll try playing around with it some more...

    Comment

    • mville
      dBpoweramp Guru

      • Dec 2008
      • 4021

      #3
      Re: Track * ordering: 1, 10, 11, 12, 2, 3, ...

      Which platform/version of Asset UPnP, have you installed?

      Comment

      • ListeningEarth

        • Jun 2018
        • 4

        #4
        Re: Track * ordering: 1, 10, 11, 12, 2, 3, ...

        Originally posted by mville
        Which platform/version of Asset UPnP, have you installed?
        Mac OS 10.11.6, Asset R6.1, NAIM app

        This behaviour seems eratic, sometimes ordering correctly beyond 9 tracks, sometimes not. And examining the filenames and tags, I can't pick anything that would lead to this.

        Comment

        • mville
          dBpoweramp Guru

          • Dec 2008
          • 4021

          #5
          Re: Track * ordering: 1, 10, 11, 12, 2, 3, ...

          Originally posted by ListeningEarth
          Mac OS 10.11.6, Asset R6.1, NAIM app

          This behaviour seems eratic, sometimes ordering correctly beyond 9 tracks, sometimes not. And examining the filenames and tags, I can't pick anything that would lead to this.
          1, 10, 11, 12, 2, 3 and so on is listing alphabetically. Padding the track number with a leading zero, may resolve this.

          Also, check for a possible configuration sorting option in Asset and/or the NAIM app?

          FYI, I am using Asset UPnP R6.1 for windows, I have padded track numbers and I don't have this issue.

          Comment

          • ListeningEarth

            • Jun 2018
            • 4

            #6
            Re: Track * ordering: 1, 10, 11, 12, 2, 3, ...

            Thanks mville

            You're right - alphabetical. I realise I'm viewing using folders/filename browsing, although I still don't understand why some albums sort OK and others not when their filenames and tags seem numbered identically.

            I'll try some more config options in Asset. There are no relevant options in the NAIM app.

            Comment

            • mville
              dBpoweramp Guru

              • Dec 2008
              • 4021

              #7
              Re: Track * ordering: 1, 10, 11, 12, 2, 3, ...

              Originally posted by ListeningEarth
              TI realise I'm viewing using folders/filename browsing, although I still don't understand why some albums sort OK and others not when their filenames and tags seem numbered identically.
              Aaah. I don't know what determines the listing sort order, when using folders/filename browsing.

              It might even be that using folders/filename browsing, files are returned by file creation date, hence the random nature of this issue, I just don't know. Spoon would have a better idea on what is going on here.

              I would still look at padding the track number.

              Comment

              • mickc
                dBpoweramp Enthusiast

                • Sep 2010
                • 152

                #8
                Re: Track * ordering: 1, 10, 11, 12, 2, 3, ...

                I always pad with a leading zero, mainly because in my early days of streaming a fair few years ago, Twonky (I think) used to get the track numbering wrong as in the first post in this thread.


                Mick

                Comment

                Working...

                ]]>