Hi,
i'm registered dbpoweramp user and everytime i'm searching for new apps around music i'm back with illustrate. :smile2: . now i'm evaluating asset upnp and have a few questions/remarks
1.) i have a large library and using the "file/folder browse" function. There i have every artist from a-z in a list (Organized Artist/Album on the hdd). Whenever i dig into a albums folder and going back up in the structure to the a-z listing. The listing will build up again, but it then is suddendly no longer sorted and starts from letter E for example. I then have to go completely out of the folder browse tree and go back into it, then its sorted again. I only have this in the browsing folder tree. Not in Other trees like Artist/Album etc.
Is this known?
2.) Search is possible everywhere (even though not with substrings - highly recommended) but not in browse folder structure. Why is that?
3.) As i believe that the search is build with SQL database queries it would be nice for future versions if users are able to create their own queries if they are knowledgable enough...
Regards
mamema
i'm registered dbpoweramp user and everytime i'm searching for new apps around music i'm back with illustrate. :smile2: . now i'm evaluating asset upnp and have a few questions/remarks
1.) i have a large library and using the "file/folder browse" function. There i have every artist from a-z in a list (Organized Artist/Album on the hdd). Whenever i dig into a albums folder and going back up in the structure to the a-z listing. The listing will build up again, but it then is suddendly no longer sorted and starts from letter E for example. I then have to go completely out of the folder browse tree and go back into it, then its sorted again. I only have this in the browsing folder tree. Not in Other trees like Artist/Album etc.
Is this known?
2.) Search is possible everywhere (even though not with substrings - highly recommended) but not in browse folder structure. Why is that?
3.) As i believe that the search is build with SQL database queries it would be nice for future versions if users are able to create their own queries if they are knowledgable enough...
Regards
mamema
Comment