Hm... I am not sure if this list is a true reflection of the drive accuracy. What about the selection of discs that are ripped? I mean if a user is ripping mostly scratched CDs his/ her drive accuracy will look pretty bad, right?
For example, I have a Plextor Premium2 as a second drive. I want to conserve it, so I only use it for ripping CDs that my regular drive cannot read w/o errors. It does a great job but it gets only the real difficult CDs which means it will get a low accuracy score in my case.
And what about people who exclusively rip newly bought CDs? No challenge fpr their drive.
Others (like me) borrow CDs from a library and rip them. Those are mostly pretty scratched... the drive used will get bad scores.
Or did I not get the point?
I will appreciate your comments and opposite views
I started with this one, and I still have two of them, but I decided to try the iHAS124 drives because they're faster. I do like the Plextors though, but they're not as accurate as a well functioning iHAS124 F or the Dell DW316:
Leave a comment: