AR entries lost?

[Porcus]

Re: AR entries lost?

CUETools and TripleFlac report that CD is not in database. Have not tried to re-rip (will have to dig it out in between thousans others ...)

And also Foobar's AR verifier says it isn't in the database ...

[Spoon]

Re: AR entries lost?

XP is the minimum (we updated our internal class system which binds to XP minimum abilities in Windows, it is a change which occasionally will happen, R13 is compatible with Windows 95, so a 15 year old OS).

[pjc2]

Re: AR entries lost?

Minimum OS yes (we compile in Visual Studio 2008 which cannot compile for Win95)

What about Win2K?

[Spoon]

Re: AR entries lost?

Minimum OS yes (we compile in Visual Studio 2008 which cannot compile for Win95)

[pjc2]

Re: AR entries lost?

It is yes.

The installer says it requires Windows XP. Is that intentional? Will Windows XP be a requirement for the eventual R14 release?

[Spoon]

Re: AR entries lost?

It is yes.

[pjc2]

Re: AR entries lost?

If you rip in R14 now (which can test across pressings) what is the result?

R14? Is it in beta already?

[Porcus]

Re: AR entries lost?

If you rip in R14 now (which can test across pressings) what is the result?

CUETools and TripleFlac report that CD is not in database. Have not tried to re-rip (will have to dig it out in between thousans others ...)

[Spoon]

Re: AR entries lost?

If you rip in R14 now (which can test across pressings) what is the result?

[Porcus]

OK, this is only a single title (two physical discs, different pressings), but it may be an indication:

DiscID: 012-0019c9a6-00f11de6-a30dd60c-1 (etc), where I did
- a rip from May 18 2008, Inaccurate (confidences 2 and 3 over the disc)
- a rip from a different pressing, Oct 12 2008, Inaccurate (confidence levels: one more, maybe from my May 18 rip)

Both with dBp 13 (might be a beta, logs don't specify).

So the disc has survived at least two database updates, but now it is gone totally.