title
Products            Buy            Support Forum            Professional            About            Codec Central
 
Results 1 to 15 of 25

Thread: Music Converter vs TuneFUSION ReplayGain

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    dBpoweramp Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    3,951

    Music Converter vs TuneFUSION ReplayGain

    Music Converter R17.4 and TuneFUSION R1.5 are producing different ReplayGain values for the same flac album, converted to mp3: The Simon and Garfunkel Collection, which has pre_emphasis.

    I notice that Music Converter and TuneFUSION are using different versions of the ReplayGain.dll.

    So, my question is which one is more reliable?

  2. #2
    Administrator
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    42,751

    Re: Music Converter vs TuneFUSION ReplayGain

    What are the track gain values? are the peaks the same?

    Other albums have matching values?

  3. #3
    dBpoweramp Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    3,951

    Re: Music Converter vs TuneFUSION ReplayGain

    Quote Originally Posted by Spoon View Post
    What are the track gain values? are the peaks the same?
    Music Converter R17.4: TuneFUSION R1.5:
    Track album_gain album_peak track_gain track_peak album_gain album_peak track_gain track_peak
    01 +5 dB 0.614929 +3.70 dB 0.374084 +6.22 dB 0.488492 +5.13 dB 0.301738
    02 +5 dB 0.614929 +4.42 dB 0.429504 +6.22 dB 0.488492 +5.43 dB 0.326575
    03 +5 dB 0.614929 +3.22 dB 0.614929 +6.22 dB 0.488492 +5.07 dB 0.488492
    04 +5 dB 0.614929 +6.30 dB 0.302704 +6.22 dB 0.488492 +7.34 dB 0.264186
    05 +5 dB 0.614929 +8.55 dB 0.313293 +6.22 dB 0.488492 +9.08 dB 0.207080
    06 +5 dB 0.614929 +6.08 dB 0.442718 +6.22 dB 0.488492 +7.61 dB 0.328555
    07 +5 dB 0.614929 +5.03 dB 0.392059 +6.22 dB 0.488492 +6.19 dB 0.338416
    08 +5 dB 0.614929 +6.83 dB 0.401642 +6.22 dB 0.488492 +8.15 dB 0.226019
    09 +5 dB 0.614929 +4.97 dB 0.503204 +6.22 dB 0.488492 +7.34 dB 0.336082
    10 +5 dB 0.614929 +3.62 dB 0.391846 +6.22 dB 0.488492 +4.86 dB 0.323621
    11 +5 dB 0.614929 +5.97 dB 0.422333 +6.22 dB 0.488492 +6.92 dB 0.298086
    12 +5 dB 0.614929 +2.72 dB 0.416443 +6.22 dB 0.488492 +4.20 dB 0.366566
    13 +5 dB 0.614929 +8.21 dB 0.338348 +6.22 dB 0.488492 +8.52 dB 0.256257
    14 +5 dB 0.614929 +3.39 dB 0.539764 +6.22 dB 0.488492 +5.08 dB 0.410773
    15 +5 dB 0.614929 +4.11 dB 0.498810 +6.22 dB 0.488492 +5.33 dB 0.462053
    16 +5 dB 0.614929 +9.09 dB 0.284882 +6.22 dB 0.488492 +9.60 dB 0.239506
    17 +5 dB 0.614929 +4.44 dB 0.426727 +6.22 dB 0.488492 +5.37 dB 0.402841

  4. #4
    dBpoweramp Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    3,951

    Re: Music Converter vs TuneFUSION ReplayGain

    Quote Originally Posted by Spoon View Post
    Other albums have matching values?
    Of 2,635 albums, 99.9% match.

  5. #5
    Administrator
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    42,751

    Re: Music Converter vs TuneFUSION ReplayGain

    You can upload this album in flac please and personal message me a link to dropbox.

  6. #6
    Administrator
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    42,751

    Re: Music Converter vs TuneFUSION ReplayGain

    EAC ripped the album, so you converted FLAC >> FLAC with replaygain DSP effect and de-emphasis? Or never applied de-emphasis in dbpoweramp?

  7. #7
    dBpoweramp Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    3,951

    Re: Music Converter vs TuneFUSION ReplayGain

    IIRC it was ripped as is, no de-emphasis and I didn't bother re-ripping with CD Ripper, as the original rip was an accuraterip.

    I simply applied the ReplayGain Utility Codec.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •