Makes sense. However, it doesn't give an answer to my second question.
Type: Posts; User: Snowknight26
Makes sense. However, it doesn't give an answer to my second question.
Guess you run this from the command line or do you do it from inside of dBpoweramp?
Also, from the command line, is there any way to specify the location of the benchmark file? Reason I ask is...
4 cores averaged 173x, just negligibly slower than 4*44x. HDD usage was almost exactly as calculated: just shy of 25MB/s.
No performance hit at all.
Nice try though. ;)
Ok, I just did several tests test on my Q6600 @ 3.3GHz, 500GB WD Caviar.
Encoding speed and encoding time values were averaged for increased accuracy:
16-bit/48KHz Stereo Apple Lossless -> FLAC...
I'm sorry, how can enabling more cores be slower? Please don't say HDD bottleneck. Today's HDDs can easily do 50, 70, even 100MB/s+.
Though I don't wish to get off topic, oh well.
12x1TB Seagate Barracuda 7200.11s (ST31000340AS) in RAID6 on an Areca 1280ML with a 4GB cache.
Not when it also has a RAID with an average read/write speed of 700MB/s.
Forgive me for bumping such an old thread, but it was the only one I could find relevant to my question.
I've noticed that the current limit to simultaneous transcodes is 4. Are there any plans to...
Copyright © illustrate 2024, All rights reserved