PDA

View Full Version : Better mp3pro codec... using nero's mp3pro perhaps?



Unregistered
12-09-2002, 10:48 AM
I am very interested in using mp3pro much more than i do now... but i don't accept 64kbps mp3pro files as being good enough.
how about using another mp3pro codec that supports the full range of mp3pro bitrates up to 96kbps stereo (or the vbr feature of the nero codec (its a retail plug-in) which sometimes yields ~112kbps mp3pro files) :|

it would greatly expand the use of the mp3pro codec implementation in dbpoweramp music converter :)

it is the only bad thing that is preventing me from using the current codec right now :(

Spoon
12-09-2002, 05:08 PM
Ogg Vorbis is technically better at around 112Kbps.

Joseph
12-09-2002, 08:36 PM
Lame v 3.93.1 is out official release now.

Unregistered
12-12-2002, 11:28 PM
i know ogg is technically better.... but im not concerned with ogg... the wish was for a better mp3pro codec. not ogg.

totalXSive
12-15-2002, 11:52 AM
Any improved mp3PRO encoder would have to be shareware, due to the licensing restrictions on it.

RayDO_TEx
12-22-2002, 12:08 PM
for example the FhG mp3enc CLI codec is shareware... - so why not make a CLI codec for NERO mp3PRO encoding for higher bitrates
:thumbdown <-- the FhG codecs don't write the VBR header for VBR mp3_s so you get wrong track length info and very inaccurate seeking
But Spoon of course can't do anything about it - so the NERO CLI codec would be good enough!

Spoon
12-22-2002, 01:03 PM
I am not sure, but I think the nero encoder is a special DLL for their program, if it is an exe I can go a CLI encoder.

RayDO_TEx
12-22-2002, 04:10 PM
the mp3PRO plug-in for Nero is actually a file called "NeMP3Enc.dll". So can ya do anything with it to fit in dMC? I could send you this file but it's shareware... should i brake the law?
Firstly I'm sending you the demoversion of the mp3PRO plug-in for nero if you're interesed!

Spoon
12-23-2002, 03:56 AM
No it is a Dll.